Assistance with Contracts
A page within Research & Sponsored Programs
Processes
New Contracts
- Gather the following documents:
- Completed grant/contract transmittal form with required signatures
- Complete in DocuSign (form preview)
- Internal budget - See the UWL budget template for an optional format.
- Contract
- Any supplementary documents (if applicable)
- Completed grant/contract transmittal form with required signatures
- Route documents for review and signatures to your department chair/unit director, dean/division director, and ORSP.
- ORSP completes review and approval of budget.
- For agreements that may or must be signed by the ORSP Director:
- ORSP will review the contract. After approval, it is signed by the ORSP Director.
- ORSP will send the signed contract to the outside entity and provide a copy of the dually signed contract to the PI/PD and Grant Accountant.
- For agreements that must be signed by the Controller or Vice Chancellor for Administration & Finance:
- After budget approval, ORSP will send your contract to the Contract Administrator for contract review.
- After the Contract Administrator's approval, it is signed by the Controller OR the Vice Chancellor for Administration & Finance.
- The contract will be returned to you to send to the outside entity. You may want to keep a copy for your own records.
- Upon receipt of the duly signed contract, make a copy/scan for yourself, and send the original back to Business Services.
Material Transfer Agreements (MTAs)
MTAs often do not have associated budgetary components, and so ORSP budget review typically is not required. However, MTAs must be reviewed for adherence to all research compliance requirements (e.g., chemical & physical safety, export controls, IBC, IP, IRB, IACUC, subrecipient risk assessment & monitoring). All protocols and other compliance requirements must be finalized before an MTA can be approved. Multiple MTA resources and templates can be on found on the AUTM website.
Below is the MTA review and approval process:
- Gather the following documents:
- Completed MTA Compliance Screening Form
- MTA (See the AUTM website if a template is needed.)
- Route documents for review and signatures.
- ORSP completes initial review and signature of the MTA screening form. Depending on the research compliance screening, you may receive a request from ORSP or Business Services for additional project information.
- After review, ORSP will send the MTA materials to the Contract Administrator for further review.
- After the Contract Administrator’s approval, it is signed by the Controller OR the Vice Chancellor for Administration and Finance.
- The MTA will be returned to you to send to the outside entity; you may want to keep a copy for your own records.
- Upon receipt of the duly signed contract, make a copy/scan for yourself, and send the original back to Business Services.
Contracts Resulting from an Awarded Grant/Extramural Funding
- Gather the following documents:
- Award letter
- Budget
- If revised, also route with a post award modifications form in DocuSign (form preview) and revised budget.
- Contract
- Send to ORSP. There is no need to route for signatures unless the budget has been revised, in which case the materials should be routed with the post award modifications form.
- ORSP completes review of budget.
- After budget approval, the ORSP Director reviews and signs the agreement. Consultation with other contacts (e.g., Compliance Specialist, relevant compliance committees) may be needed.
- ORSP will send a copy of the signed agreement back to the sponsor.
- Upon receipt of the duly signed contract from the sponsor, ORSP will send a copy to the PI/PD and Grant Accountant.
Modifications to Existing Contracts
- Gather the following documents:
- Post award modification form (in DocuSign or Word format)
- Explanation of the requested/negotiated changes and any supporting documentation that can clarify the modifications for those reviewing the changes, such as:
- Revised internal budget - indicate and explain the changes
- Revised budget justification
- Revised project description or scope
- Revised contract or contract addendum/amendment
- Route for signatures to your unit director/department chair, dean/division director, and ORSP.
- ORSP completes review of budget.
- For modifications that may or must be signed by the ORSP Director:
- ORSP will review the modification. After approval, it is signed by the ORSP Director.
- ORSP will send the signed modification to the outside entity and provide a copy of the dually signed contract to the PI/PD and Grant Accountant.
- For modifications that must be signed by the Controller or Vice Chancellor for Administration & Finance:
- After budget approval, ORSP will send your contract to the Contract Administrator for review.
- After the Contract Administrator's approval, it is signed by the Controller OR the Vice Chancellor for Administration and Finance.
- The contract will be returned to you to send to the outside entity. You may want to keep a copy for your own records.
- Upon receipt of the duly signed contract, make a copy/scan for yourself, and send the original back to Business Services.
Note: Modifications to existing grants, agreement amendments, or supplements related to extramural funding require the signature of the ORSP Director. Agreements/modifications related to federal funding or compliance often also require the signature of the ORSP Director. In these cases, after ORSP review and approval, ORSP will send a copy of the signed agreement back to the sponsor, the PI/PD, and the Grant Accountant.
FAQs
What is a contract?
Contracts, for the purposes of this webpage, are agreements negotiated with governmental agencies, nonprofit organizations, businesses, and individuals to provide a specific product or service. This might include research, testing, or other services provided to an outside entity, or research materials received from or provided to an outside entity.
When do I need to seek approval?
You must seek approval from the Office of Research & Sponsored Programs (ORSP) and Business Services when entering into a contract, which may or may not involve monetary compensation, if one or more of the following conditions are met:
- the work will take place on campus
- university or other state resources will be used to complete the work
- the funds for the work will flow through UWL (Business Services will be administering the funds)
- research materials will be received from or provided to an outside entity (e.g., via MTA)
Who should I contact if I'm not sure whether I need approval or if it is a contract?
Both the Contract Administrator and ORSP can assist you in making those determinations.
What if I want to hire someone to perform a service on campus?
That would be beyond the scope of the services that ORSP provides. Contact the Contract Administrator for assistance. You can also find additional information on the Contracting for Personal Services page.
What should be considered when developing a contract budget?
- Have a clear internal budget. Use your own template or the UWL budget template.
- Include a note to explain anything not clearly covered in the contract. If the contract lists only total funding with few budgetary details, a budget justification can provide needed clarity.
- Fringe benefits are REQUIRED to be included in your budget. If the other party is asking for waived or reduced fringe benefits, contact ORSP for assistance.
- Indirect costs are REQUIRED to be included in your budget. If the other party is asking for waived or reduced indirect costs, contact ORSP for assistance. Documentation of the other party's established, uniformly-applied indirect policy will be required before waivers or reductions will be considered. NOTE: MVAC and Student Health Center personnel should use their Business Services/ORSP approved rates.
What are the compliance requirements for contracts?
Just as with work you would be engaged in related to a grant or any other project, you are responsible for ensuring that you and any others working on the contract are compliant with federal statutes related to IRB, IACUC, IBC, IP, dual use research of concern (DURC) and pathogens with enhanced pandemic potential (PEPP), export controls, FCOI, nepotism disclosures, RECR, subaward risk assessment & monitoring, etc. Please see the main compliance page for additional information. Listed below are special notes related to federal, some sponsor-specific contracts, and Material Transfer Agreements (MTAs):
- ALL federal contracts are subject to Financial Conflict of Interest (FCOI) compliance regulations and, if subawards are involved, subaward risk assessment & monitoring requirements.
- NSF, USDA, and some NIH contracts are subject to Responsible Conduct of Research compliance regulations if students or post docs will be working on the project.
- MTAs must be reviewed for adherence to all research compliance requirements (e.g., chemical & physical safety, export controls, IBC, IP, IRB, IACUC, subaward risk assessment & monitoring). All protocols and other compliance requirements, including congruence checks, must be finalized before an MTA can be approved. The compliance review process is administered via the MTA Compliance Screening Form.
If you have any questions, please contact ORSP for assistance.
Are there signature block requirements?
All contracts must contain specific language in the signature block, or they cannot be signed. It is mandatory for the contract to be legal and binding. Sample language is available on the contract signature block information sheet.
What are the timing considerations for contract processing?
- Contracts may require negotiation to comply with state and UW System regulations and policies. Route contracts early to reduce the risk of a delayed contract start date.
- Research compliance requirements may require additional time to address. For example, all protocols and other compliance requirements must be finalized before an MTA can be approved.
What are the required institutional review and approvals?
At minimum, sponsored research contracts require the approval of a principal investigator's/project director's (PI's/PD's) department chair/unit director, college dean/division director, and the Office of Research & Sponsored Programs (ORSP). Contracts may also require the review and approval of the Contract Administrator and Vice Chancellor for Administration & Finance. In addition, consultation and approval from other offices may be required depending on the content and purpose of the contract (e.g., purchasing, travel, grant accountant). To avoid delays in the review and approval process, it is recommended that you consult with ORSP and the Contract Administrator as early as possible to support agreement planning and development.
Only authorized contracting personnel may sign contracts on the behalf of the university per UW Board of Regents Policy 13-1. Individual faculty/staff are not authorized to sign agreements on behalf of the university, and individuals could assume personal responsibility and liability for the contract and for paying any damages, financial or otherwise, that may result. In addition, the program or activity that the contract was intended to support may be hindered by the lack of authorized signature. Refer to the list of authorized contracting personnel for more information.